What gets reviewed
- Accuracy of page purpose and search intent
- Heading clarity and mobile readability
- Internal links to related guides
- Meta titles and descriptions
- Structured data alignment with visible content
- Editorial tone and consistency
When pages are reviewed
Pages are reviewed during sitewide SEO passes, after new support pages are added, and before major publishing milestones. For example, when the recovery cluster expanded, main pages such as recovery in Istanbul and stay duration were updated to reflect the stronger cluster.
What an update is supposed to improve
Updates should make a page easier to understand, easier to navigate, or more complete in the context of the wider cluster. That might mean adding a better quick answer, tightening headings, or linking more clearly to the next relevant page.
What counts as a useful improvement
A useful improvement is one that helps the reader make sense of the process more calmly. Examples include clarifying the relationship between return-flight timing and hotel booking length, or explaining how sleep comfort fits into the first recovery week.
What this review policy avoids
The site does not chase constant superficial edits purely to signal freshness. Updates are meant to improve usefulness and coherence, not to create noise.
Frequently asked questions
Does every change require a full rewrite?
No. Many good updates are structural: clearer headings, better internal links, tighter introductions, or better related-reading sections.
Why review meta and structured data too?
Because search visibility depends on both useful visible content and clean technical presentation.